Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:05
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How do you weigh in on the Vance-couch conversation?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are your funniest "lost in translation" moments if you grew up speaking more than one language?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How did you become popular in school?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Which genre of novels is most profitable to publish and why?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why are black women the largest unmarried group in the United States of America?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
"Brokeback Mountain" broke hearts on the big screen, and it's back to do it again - Salon.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Eum sit quibusdam aperiam culpa ipsa culpa odio.
What’s next?
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What are some of the greatest marketing disasters in history?